Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘socialism’

I occasionally mix up words and their meanings, in part because I’m drawn to words that roll off the tongue and in part because my brain lacks optimal agility. But I try hard not to use words carelessly or thoughtlessly and I’m careful not to toss off bon mots without making sure I have a handle on what they actually mean. In the world of politics, however, all is fair, which doesn’t make it any easier to ignore the twisting and turning, the skewing and screwing of the meanings of certain words for the twin purposes of inspiring fear and misrepresenting the views of those unknown people known as the Others.

Who are these “Others”? What words can possibly describe a group, let alone their beliefs, which poses such a clear threat to our very way of life?  Ladies and gentlemen, I have met the enemy and he is apparently me. I am such an Other. I’m also a United States citizen and I’ve had it up to here with insults and aspersions and yes, I’m ready to fight back. Hand me a dictionary.  CA7XFZKMCAPQHZ2YCAA3QKOQCAEK026ZCA91YWSYCADB339QCALURQF8CAKSMRQCCAE1WP27CALZF82ECAUEL6XOCAEXMAGICAPCK0N9CA539OOSCAV1I7VECAWK10YWCAfighter

Herewith, a selective list of the most inexcusably misused words and phrases that are currently being fired off like weapons of mass deception. Believe me, I’ve barely begun:

 1.  liberal: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; having political or social views favoring reform and progress. These are good views to have, American views, one might say. Furthermore, there is no evidence that liberals are less moral, less family-oriented or less about the American way of life.   

2.     socialism (see also socialist): A system of government that aims to prevent the concentration of wealth within a small segment of society, either by complete nationalization of the means of production and distribution or, as is far more common in contemporary society, selective nationalization of key industries while maintaining private ownership of capital and private business enterprise. People, we do NOT live in a socialist country and we’re not likely to. Government oversight is not a bad thing. It’s not always good either; I’m not keen about endless snooping disguised as protection from terrorism. But all this ranting about losing your “freedom”; what are we talking about? Freedom to openly carry a gun? You got it, at least in some states. Freedom from taxes? How would you like your vaunted terrorism protection provided to you? Or your roads paved? How about the freedom to live in this country without giving a crap about the effect your way of life has on other people? Yeah, I thought you’d like that one. If I were you, I’d pay more attention to privacy issues. But that’s another argument.  

3.      moral: (see also immoral); of or pertaining to matters of right and wrong. Believe it or not, the world is becoming more moral over time — slowly, imperceptibly and selectively throughout the world. For example, many people (although regrettably, not all) see slavery and genocide as wrong. It still seems necessary to remind the fine citizens of this country that people who don’t agree with them aren’t necessarily immoral. Neither are atheists or agnostics. Neither is the concept of social justice, never mind Glenn Beck. 

4.      elite: a group or class of persons enjoying superior intellectual, social, political, or economic status. Okay, I can see where this would inspire envy and anger, especially when it appears to be deliberately exclusionary. But then why do we exempt athletes, lucky reality show stars, or outrageously overpaid political commentators?  Why don’t we focus on the word’s secondary meaning, i.e. “best in class”? That’d give us all something to aspire to. 

5.      theory: a well-substantiated and plausible explanation of a phenomena. Scientific theories are generally accepted as true, unless and until new evidence is discovered that alters the accepted explanation. Scientific theories aren’t like conspiracy theories, and evolution isn’t just “one of several explanations.” 

6.    secular: wordly, temporal, not overtly religious (see also “humanist), i.e. someone who does not believe religion is required in order to “provide for the common good” or “promote the general welfare” of a society. Secularists may be atheist, agnostic, freethinkers, private religious, or spiritual; but not necessarily, as Newt Gingrich likes to say, “godless.” And yet, they do believe church and state need to stay very separate. I am proud to say that yes, I am a secular person and this is my country, too. 

7.      Constitution (of the United States): the foundation and source of the legal authority underlying the existence of the United States of America and the federal government of the United States. Three points to consider: a) it’s a legal document and subject to amendment and interpretation b) it does not appear to have been written in order to create and preserve a Christian nation but rather to protect a potentially persecuted minority 3) before anyone is accused of subverting the Constitution, the accuser should have read the Constitution.      

      I pride myself on being a reasonable, open-minded person who is more than willing to listen to the complaints and concerns of my fellow citizens. I share some of those concerns, especially as I begin to fill out my census form and consider how the information will be used. But I’ve been feeling under attack recently and I don’t like it. I’m getting a little edgy, not so much afraid as irritated. And you do not want to irritate me; I might wallop you with my Webster’s.  Websters2

Read Full Post »

The news confounds, the mind boggles. Maybe this is what happens in an all -information world. Or in August. Or when people are unable to distinguish between fact and fantasy or between critical and less so.  Or when they feel disenfranchised. Or hungry. Or tired. Or when they’re married to Bill Clinton. You get the picture.

What I thought I’d do this week is something called: What can you say? Below are tidbits I’ve come across this week in the news. Don’t think there’s necessarily anything that needs to be said; in fact this may be a rhetorical question. To tell the truth, I was stopped dead in my tracks by much of this. NOTE: As usual, this is a mix of the deadly serious, the seriously weird, and the weirdly logical. I apologize for the juxtaposition but that’s what the news is these days.

1. “This is about the dismantling of the country…we don’t want this country to turn into RUSSIA.” images(a woman speaking at a town hall meeting on health care in Lebanon, Pennsylvania).

 

2. This man

mitchell_190was hired to help structure the United States interrogation program, although he had never carried out a real interrogation, had no relevant scholarship, no language skills and no Al Qada expertise.

 

 3.  “Children are killed, women are raped and the world closes its eyes.” (comment by a woman in refugee camp on the outskirts of Goma in the DRC where Secretary of State Clinton toured recently) 535a19442c

 4. Yale University Press has determined a new book about the controversy surrounding the Danish cartoons book-3-190depicting Muhammad, a controversy that subsequently incited riots around the world, cannot include those twelve drawings, nor any other illustrations of the prophet.

 

5.  New research suggests that “the physical stress of marital loss continues long after emotional wounds have broken heartshealed and those who become single… suffer from a decline in physical health from which they never fully recover.

 

 

6. Paula Abdul, announcing her departure from “American Idol” on her Twitter feed, insisted her week is “idol-75filled with network meetings” about potential projects.

 

(I mean really, what can you say?)

Read Full Post »